| 立案功能的冲突与立法调整 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李德恩.立案功能的冲突与立法调整[J].河北理工大学学报(社会科学版),2006,6(2):64-66. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李德恩 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 九江大学,法学院,江西,九江,332005 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 刑事诉讼的启动程序具有两大基本功能,输入功能和过滤功能.在中国,立案的输入功能存在先天不足,而基于人权保障的理由,立案的过滤功能得到过分强调.立法和司法实践存在的严重脱节使这一程序的改革成为必然,对其功能的定位也必须重新认识,要淡化其案件过滤功能和由此产生的人权保障功能.
|
| 关 键 词： | 输入功能 过滤功能 调整 定位 |
| 文章编号： | 1673-2804(2006)02-0064-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年9月22日 |
On the Conflict and Adjustment between Filing Case Functions |
| |
| LI De-en.On the Conflict and Adjustment between Filing Case Functions[J].Journal of Hebei Polytechnic University(Social Science Edition),2006,6(2):64-66. |
| |
| Authors: | LI De-en |
| |
| Abstract: | The start procedure of criminal suit should have two basic functions.One is the importing function,the other is the filtering function.In China,the importing function is imperfect and the filtering function has been emphasized with the reason of protecting human rights.The legislation has been divorced from practice and the procedure must be reformed.The position of the filing case functions must be fixed in another way.The filtering function and the protecting human rihgts function should be drawn back. |
| |
| Keywords: | the importing function the filtering function adjustment fixing position |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
