首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

人心与人欲——《〈朱子语类〉中两条重要语录辩误》之辨误
引用本文:许家星.人心与人欲——《〈朱子语类〉中两条重要语录辩误》之辨误[J].学术界,2012(7):126-134,288.
作者姓名:许家星
作者单位:南昌大学江右哲学研究中心,江西南昌,330031
基金项目:江西省社科规划项目《朱子四书学系列比较研究》,教育部人文社科青年《江右四书学研究》
摘    要:《〈朱子语类〉中两条重要语录辩误》一文认为,《语类》卷七十八两条语录中"人欲"均是"人心"之误,指出此误造成较严重后果,并就国内多名知名朱子学者的观点提出商榷。《辩误》发表以来未见学界回应,其观点为台湾知名学者李明辉先生所采用。仔细体会这两条语录的语义,考察朱子人心、人欲说的分疏定位及历史渊源,从文献、义理及朱子后学的看法证《语录》不误,《辩误》实误,其误源于以绝对、单一、静止眼光看待朱子人心、人欲说,忽视了这一对概念在朱子思想中的多样涵义,遮蔽了朱子思想内涵的复杂性与形成过程的艰巨性。

关 键 词:语类  辩误  人心  人欲

Heart and Desire——Criticial Analysis of Two Important Quotations of Zhuziyulei
Xu Jiaxing.Heart and Desire——Criticial Analysis of Two Important Quotations of Zhuziyulei[J].Academics in China,2012(7):126-134,288.
Authors:Xu Jiaxing
Institution:Xu Jiaxing Nanchang University
Abstract:Analysis of two important Quotations of Zhuziyulei think that "heart"was mistaken as "desire"in two Quotations of yulei 78 volume,and point out the serious consequence produced by the mistake,put up critical idea on the question.Scholars haven’t answered the critical idea except the famous scholar Li Minghui of Taiwan who accepts the critical idea.On the basis of the meaning of two Quotations,by analyzing the usage of the heart and desire of zhuzi,literature and thinking and the point of zhuzi’s disciple,we find that it isn’t the wrong of yulei but the article of Analysis.The reason is the author sees the problem with an absolute,single and static eyes,and overlooks the complex and diversity of the pair concept in zhuzi’s thinking system.
Keywords:criticizing  zhuziyulei  heart and desire
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号