| 论担保物权竞合之效力 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘永鑫.论担保物权竞合之效力[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2004,20(2):54-57. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘永鑫 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国环境管理干部学院 文法系, 河北秦皇岛 066004 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 抵押权、质权、留置权等担保物权的竞合时有发生,关于担保物竞合的法律效力,目前我国法律没有统一规定。确定担保物权竞合的效力需要一定的价值尺度,如法定利益优先、完全担保权人利益优先、公示优先等,根据统一的价值尺度设定担保物权竞合效力的模式;担保物权竞合时物上请求权与债权请求权的实现有所不同。
|
| 关 键 词： | 担保物权竞合 法定利益 完全担保权人 公示及特定公示 |
| 收稿时间： | 2004-02-26 |
A Study of the Validity of the Concurrence of Secunriy Interest |
| |
| LIU Yong-xin.A Study of the Validity of the Concurrence of Secunriy Interest[J].Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition),2004,20(2):54-57. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Yong-xin |
| |
| Institution: | Department of Humanities and Social Science, Environmental Management College of China, Qinhuangdao 066004, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The concurrence of the hypothecation,pledge and lien often happens,but Chinese law doesn't have a unifited regulation concerning the validity of the conturrence. To ensure that validity needs certain measures of value, such as priority of legal interest,priority of the total guarantee's interest and notification priority. The designation of concurrence validity module should be based on a unified measure of value. There are differences between the realizations of security interest petition and debe petition. |
| |
| Keywords: | the concurrence of security interest logal interests total guarantee notification and special notification |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文 |
