首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论民事诉讼法律逻辑与生活逻辑的分野
引用本文:骆东平.论民事诉讼法律逻辑与生活逻辑的分野[J].西华师范大学学报(自然科学版),2004(6):66-69.
作者姓名:骆东平
作者单位:三峡大学 湖北宜昌443002
摘    要:由于最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的规定体现的程序本位理念在我国处于“无根”栽培状态,从而导致了民事诉讼法律逻辑与生活逻辑的分野。两种逻辑所代表的两种秩序间的冲突源于不同的哲学基础、不同的利益考量与分享。因此,问题的解决以能从根本上改变人的价值基本准则的利益分配为核心是两种逻辑整合的理性选择。

关 键 词:程序本位  法律逻辑  生活逻辑  分野
文章编号:1005-1465(2004)06-0066-04
修稿时间:2003年12月1日

ON THE SEPARATION BETWEEN THE LEGAL LOGIC AND LIVING LOGIC IN CIVIL PROCEDURE
LUO Dong-Ping.ON THE SEPARATION BETWEEN THE LEGAL LOGIC AND LIVING LOGIC IN CIVIL PROCEDURE[J].Journal of China West Normal University:Philosophy & Social Sciences,2004(6):66-69.
Authors:LUO Dong-Ping
Abstract:Though the ideal of priority of procedures had been expressed in the Regulation on Evidence for Civil Procedurals decreed by Superme People's Court ,the ideal is in non-root condition in China ,which leads to the separation between the legal logic and living logic of civil procedure.The conflict between the two logics is due to the differences between the base of philosohy and pondering and assignment of benefit . In order to combine the two logics ,it is a rational choice to make the ideal of fundermental values change completely by the assignment of benefit.
Keywords:priority of procedure  legal logic  living logic  separation
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号