首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Response to Amundson,Lux and Hindmarch: Critique of Investigative Practices Article
Abstract:ABSTRACT

This article responds to a commentary by Amundson, Lux and Hindmarch (2005), in which they offer a pejorative criticism about our article (Austin & Kirkpatrick, 2004) in which we described the investigative component within comprehensive child custody evaluations–something they label as “maximalist” evaluations and contrast with a model they prefer called the “minimalist” approach. We believe our approach to custody evaluations is in keeping with the current standard of practice and professional guidelines.
Keywords:Child custody evaluation  child custody evaluation models  investigation  scientist-practitioner  forensic  clinical
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号