| 论儒家对幸福问题的解决 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张晚林.论儒家对幸福问题的解决[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2005,11(3):289-293. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张晚林 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖南科技大学人文学院,湖南湘潭,411201 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 人既是一种物质性的存在,则这种物质性的存在的调护滋养,即人的幸福问题是任何文化必须重视解决的重大问题,一方面不能随便抹杀,另一方面不能使其泛滥无节制.而要解决好这个问题,其关键便是为幸福开显一个规导性的场域,使幸福在这个规导性的场域中得其正.通过对西方文艺复兴时期的人文主义和康德的批判哲学的疏解可知,幸福的规导性的场域惟有儒家由道德的主体所开启的人文主义方可确立得起来,而儒家一旦确立起这个场域,则在幸福问题上有"修己"与"治人"的区别,以求仁者心安.这是儒家对幸福问题的解决的最后结论.
|
| 关 键 词： | 幸福 人文主义 康德 儒家 道德主体 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-3104(2005)03-0289-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年4月12日 |
On the thought of Confucianism about happiness |
| |
| ZHANG Wan-lin.On the thought of Confucianism about happiness[J].Journal of Central South Huiversity: Social Science,2005,11(3):289-293. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Wan-lin |
| |
| Abstract: | As a physical being, happiness is an important question that every culture must solve: on the one hand, happiness can't be neglected; on the other hand, it can't have no regulation. It is the key to the finding of a mind field where happiness can be standardized.Comparing the Confucian humanism with the humanism of Renanissance and Kant's philosophy,this paper argues that the mind field can only be established by the former. In the mind field, the thought of Confucianism about happiness is different on academic standpoint from on political standpoint in order that the benevolent feels at ease, it is the final conclusion of Confucianism about happiness. |
| |
| Keywords: | happiness humanism Kant Confucianism ethical subject |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
