Sexual and reproductive health policies for foster youth in California: A qualitative study of child welfare professionals' experiences and perceptions of policies |
| |
| Institution: | 1. University of Murcia, Faculty of Psychology, Espinardo, Murcia CP: 30100, Spain;2. Catholic University San Antonio, Faculty of Social Sciences and Communication, Guadalupe, Murcia CP: 30107, Spain;3. Mental Health Center of Cieza, Murcia CP: 30530, Spain;1. Boys Town National Research Institute for Child and Family Studies, 14100 Crawford Street, Boys Town, NE 68010, USA;2. Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders, 204 Barkley Memorial Center, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA;3. Social Development Research Group, 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 401, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98115, USA;4. Department of Child, Youth, and Family Studies, 135 Mabel Lee Hall, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA;5. Department of Psychology, 1845 Fairmount Street, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS 67260, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | Child welfare professionals and foster parents increasingly suggest the importance of establishing clear and consistent policies and procedures to address the sexual and reproductive health of youth in foster care. The present study examines the content and context of such policies across 18 California counties through a search of publically available county policy documents, and surveys and expert interviews with child welfare professionals (N = 22). A policy framework for agenda setting and policymaking was used to guide the data collection and analysis process. Child welfare professionals were aware of multiple sources of information, support and services for foster youths' sexual and reproductive health, though few practiced in counties with formal policies that outline the resources and support that youth should receive. Participants demonstrated widespread recognition that issues of youth sexual and reproductive health were significant; posing challenges to youth, foster parents and child welfare staff. Identified policy solutions included: 1) training for social workers and foster parents; 2) collaborative partnerships with public health nurses and community providers; 3) data tracking and monitoring of outcomes to assess youth needs and evaluate the impact of programs and policies; and 4) involvement by advocacy organizations in defining problems and advocating for improved services and support for youth in care. Social workers largely perceived that support from child welfare administrators and policy leaders is necessary to prioritize this issue and initiate policy formation. Additional research is needed to further examine the impact of policy mandates on social workers, foster parents and youth in foster care. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
