首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中、美、日、德四国制造业污染防控政策工具选择的比较研究
引用本文:张慧明,曹杰. 中、美、日、德四国制造业污染防控政策工具选择的比较研究[J]. 阅江学刊, 2014, 0(6): 52-63
作者姓名:张慧明  曹杰
作者单位:南京信息工程大学,南京210044
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目“环境规制下我国制造业转型升级研究”(71173116); 国家社科基金“我国新能源设备制造业补贴的适度规模及模式选择研究”(13CGL094); 江苏高校哲学社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“新型制造业与创新型国家建设互动发展研究”(2010JDXM028); 江苏省高校“青蓝工程”资助项目; 江苏省政府留学奖学金项目(苏教办外[2014]21号)
摘    要:中国制造业的污染防控问题是现实上为各利益相关者所关注,而理论研究有待深入的难题。从国际比较的视角来看,当前我国制造业污染防控政策强调绿色规划与产业布局,法规管制与公共参与,未能给予政府资金投入、损害补偿机制、融资与税收、信息披露、污染治理协议等政策以充分重视,关注政策的框架,却忽视内容细节,需要制定政策加大制造业污染防控的政府资金投入并优化资金投入结构、细化损害补偿机制与行政问责机制、创新市场化政策、拓宽污染防控规划的范围等。

关 键 词:制造业  污染防控  政策工具  国际比较

Comparison of Prevention and Control Policy Tools on Pollution from Manufacturing Industry in US,Japan,Germany and China
ZHANG Hui-ming,CAO Jie. Comparison of Prevention and Control Policy Tools on Pollution from Manufacturing Industry in US,Japan,Germany and China[J]. Yuejiang Academic Journal, 2014, 0(6): 52-63
Authors:ZHANG Hui-ming  CAO Jie
Affiliation:( Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanfing, 210044, China)
Abstract:Pollution prevention and control of manufacturing in China is a matter of concern for all stakeholders,however,it needs an urgent solution theoretically. This paper,from the perspective of international comparison,classifies the manufacturing pollution prevention and control policy tools into four groups of goal planning,command-control,market mechanism and voluntary type. Based on this,it makes a comparative analysis of manufacturing pollution prevention and control policy tools. Results indicate that there are defects in pollution damage compensation and pollution control protocol mechanisms,pollution prevention and control planning scope,funding amount and structure and marketization policies. Finally it offers suggestions.
Keywords:manufacturing industry  pollution control  policy tools  international comparison
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号