辩护者还是颠覆者——德里达同马克思理论质点异同的分疏及启示

只要资本幸存一天，马克思就是批判理论无法超越的地平。德里达的解构主义作为一种激进的批判叙事，与马克思的理论交集集中体现在三个层面：强调历史的生成性和开放性；对资本主义现实的激烈批判；对人的解放的积极憧憬。然而，在上述论域的关键理论质点和政治立场上，德里达完全异质于马克思的逻辑场域，这给我们两点启示：一要坚持历史唯物主义的“基础-主导”方法论范式，全面理解资本主义的当代变化；二要对马克思主义理论生产的旨趣和边界保持清醒的意识。

Communication and Discrepancy between Derrida and Marx and its Edifications

Karl Marx, with his critical theories, continues to be a horizon that cannot be transcen ded as long as the capitalism survives. As a radical critical narrative, Jacques Derrida＇s deconstruction is naturally attracted by Marx in discourse and communication. The communication as such consists of three aspects： the awareness that history is open and producing, the purport of drastic critique to the reality, and the hope for the liberation of mankind. However, there are fundamental discrepancies be tween Marx and Derrida in their political stances and key theoretical points. Both the communication and the discrepancies bring us two edifications： one is to adhere to the methodological paradigm of ＂prerequisite-predominance＂ in historical materialism and to grapple with them dialectically, and the other is to be cautious with the production of theories and to undo them constantly.