Sexual orientation and self-reported lying |
| |
Authors: | Nathan Berg Donald Lien |
| |
Institution: | (1) School of Economic, Political, and Policy Sciences, University of Texas-Dallas, 800 W. Campbell Rd., GR31, Richardson, TX 75083-3021, USA;(2) Department of Economics, University of Texas-San Antonio, 6900 North Loop 1604 West, San Antonio, TX 78249-0633, USA |
| |
Abstract: | This paper examines empirical links between sexual orientation and self-reported lying using data collected in several waves
of Georgia Institute of Technology’s World Wide Web Users Survey. The data include questions about sexual orientation, lying
in cyberspace, and a broad range of demographic information. According to the theoretical framework of Gneezy (Am Econ Rev
95: 384–395, 2005) on the economics of deception, individuals conceal or falsify information when the expected benefit of lying exceeds its
costs in terms of psychic disutility. If non-heterosexuals expect to benefit more by falsifying information, then this theory
predicts higher rates of lying among non-heterosexuals. The data show that gays and lesbians do indeed report lying more often
than heterosexuals, both unconditionally in bivariate correlations and after controlling for demographic and geographic differences.
These empirical results are consistent with the conclusion that non-heterosexuals expect higher benefits from concealing personal
information because of anti-homosexual discrimination.
|
| |
Keywords: | Deception Sexual orientation Gay Misreporting Non-response |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|