首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

死刑司法控制的地方性实践与方向
引用本文:徐岱,陈劲阳. 死刑司法控制的地方性实践与方向[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2012, 0(5): 112-120,160
作者姓名:徐岱  陈劲阳
作者单位:吉林大学法学院
基金项目:英国政府战略基金规划项目
摘    要:严格控制和慎重适用死刑是我国现阶段司法机关的目标和任务。现阶段对死刑进行司法控制,其实际效果特别是司法效率与司法公正更优于死刑的立法控制。实现死刑司法控制的路径在于:一是倡导死刑裁量者树立刑法谦抑的人权保障刑法观念;二是建立死刑适用的量刑规范化标准;三是明确死刑司法控制的目标或对象范围应是严重暴力类犯罪;四是明确死刑司法控制的主要替代措施是死缓制度的适用。立足于对J省死刑裁量法官的调研,从地方司法实践中归纳出广泛认同的死刑裁量规则,并在此基础上形成的《J省死刑裁量标准指导意见》,是对严格控制和慎重适用死刑政策一个新的诠释。

关 键 词:死刑裁量  死刑司法控制  刑法谦抑  死缓制度

On the Direction and the Local Practices of the Judicial Control of Death Penalty
XU Dai,CHEN Jin-yang. On the Direction and the Local Practices of the Judicial Control of Death Penalty[J]. Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition, 2012, 0(5): 112-120,160
Authors:XU Dai  CHEN Jin-yang
Affiliation:XU Dai,CHEN Jin-yang
Abstract:To Severely control and cautiously applying the death penalty is the goal and task of China’s judicial branch at present time,which is with better effect than the legislative control of death penalty.The approach of judicial control of death penalty lies in the following aspects: first,to suggest the personnel in using death penalty to follow the view of human rights protection in the applying of appropriated judicial law,second,to complete the standard applying code for death penalty,third,to make clear that the objects of judicial control of death penalty is in severe criminal offending cases;and,the fourth,to make clear that the replacement of the judicial control of death penalty is the using of reprieve.This paper is based on the investigation of J Province and to make the conclusion from the local judicial practices of the rule of death penalty which has got broad agreement,and which is a very new interpretation of the severe control and cautious using of death penalty in China.
Keywords:the discretion of death penalty  judicial control  to limit the criminal law  reprieve of death
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号