首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

试述共同犯罪中止的认定
引用本文:李智良,李阳春.试述共同犯罪中止的认定[J].南华大学学报(社会科学版),2004,5(1):67-69.
作者姓名:李智良  李阳春
作者单位:1. 湖南工程学院,人文社科系,湖南,湘潭,411105
2. 湖南工程学院讲师
摘    要:当前对于共同犯罪案件如何认定犯罪中止 ,学术界和司法实践中是仁者见仁 ,智者见智。文章首先列举了学界的几种关于共同犯罪中止认定的观点 ,然后根据刑法原则和有关共同犯罪与犯罪中止的理论分析了各自的不足之处。作者主张 ,共同犯罪中止的认定 ,应以行为人自动停止犯罪并有效地阻止其他共犯利用其先前行为继续实施犯罪或防止危害结果的发生为标准。这种有效性认定标准不是将共同犯罪看成共犯行为的简单相加体现了共同犯罪内部各个共犯行为的相互利用、相互依赖的关系。

关 键 词:共同犯罪  犯罪中止  有效性
文章编号:1009-4504(2004)01-0067-03
修稿时间:2003年9月8日

Determination on Desistance of Complicity
LI Zhi-liang,LI Yang-chun.Determination on Desistance of Complicity[J].Journal of Nanhua University(Social Science Edition),2004,5(1):67-69.
Authors:LI Zhi-liang  LI Yang-chun
Abstract:At present, both the judicial apparatus in practice and the jurists in research have quite different opinions on the issue of how to determine the desistance of crime among cases of complicity. The article, firstly, lists several opinions ever existing in determining desistance of crime of complicity. Then it analyzes the defects of each opinion according to principles of criminal law and theories of desistance of crime and complicity. The author thinks that the determining standard of desistance of complicity should be that the criminal has suspended the previous acts or prevented the emerging of harmful consequences. This standard does not regard complicity as the simple adding of joint offenses but reveals that there is mutual influence and dependence on each joint offensive action.
Keywords:complicity  desistance of crime  validity  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《南华大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《南华大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号