首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

立功的刑事责任问题探讨
引用本文:孟庆华,尚菲. 立功的刑事责任问题探讨[J]. 河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2007, 32(4): 86-89
作者姓名:孟庆华  尚菲
作者单位:1. 河北大学,政法学院,河北,保定,071002
2. 中央司法警官学院,河北,保定,071002
摘    要:一般立功的刑事责任是"可以从轻或者减轻处罚",其中的"可以"与"应当"不能等同。重大立功的刑事责任是"可以减轻或者免除处罚",但不包括"可以从轻处罚"。犯罪后自首又有重大立功表现的,应当减轻或者免除处罚,该规定适用于犯罪极其严重的罪犯明显不当,因而有必要在"应当减轻或者免除处罚"的基础上增加"应当从轻处罚"规定。犯罪后自首又有一般立功的刑事责任无立法规定,比较适宜采用"应当从轻或减轻处罚"的原则来解决。

关 键 词:立功  重大立功  犯罪后自首  刑事责任
文章编号:1005-6378(2007)04-0086-04
修稿时间:2007-02-12

On the Criminal Liability of Rendering Meritorious Service
MENG Qin-hua,SHANG Fei. On the Criminal Liability of Rendering Meritorious Service[J]. Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science), 2007, 32(4): 86-89
Authors:MENG Qin-hua  SHANG Fei
Abstract:The criminal liability of rendering meritorious service is "may penalize leniently or penalize alleviatively",but "may" is not equal to "should".The criminal liability of rendering significant meritorious service is "may penalize alleviatively or exempt penalty",not including "may penalize leniently".Voluntary surrenderer after committing a crime,one who renders significant meritorious service should penalize alleviatively or exempt penalty.This rule applies to the criminal who commits a severe crime,which is obviously inappropriate.Therefore it is necessary to add "should penalize leniently" to "should penalize alleviatively or exempt penalty".There is no rule about the criminal liability for one surrendering voluntarily and rendering meritorious service, which is more suitable for adopting "should penalize leniently or alleviatively".
Keywords:render meritorious service render significant meritorious service voluntarily surrender after committing a crime criminal liability
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号