首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

如此“学术品位”——评《中国文言小说总目提要》
引用本文:占骁勇.如此“学术品位”——评《中国文言小说总目提要》[J].云梦学刊,2005,26(3):22-25.
作者姓名:占骁勇
作者单位:华中科技大学,中文系,湖北,武汉,430000
摘    要:宁稼雨所“撰”的《中国文言小说总目提要》意图超越包括《中国文言文小说书目》在内的许多小说书目和词典,但他著录一些己见著录、仍然存在并很容易见到的小说动辄云“未见著录”、“已佚”和“未见”,在小说的分类、类型问题上,也表现得轻率和随意。更让人怀疑他的“学术品位”的是,他的《提要》不但没有“尽可能标明出处来源”,而是大肆“掠美”,其中抄自李剑国的《唐前志怪小说史》和《唐五代志怪传奇叙录》二书的内容最多。

关 键 词:宁稼雨  中国文言小说总目提要  抄袭  李剑国
文章编号:1006-6365(2005)03-0022-04
修稿时间:2004年12月6日

Such Academic Taste:A Comment On The Bibliography Synopsis of Classical Chinese Novels
ZHAN Xiao-yong.Such Academic Taste:A Comment On The Bibliography Synopsis of Classical Chinese Novels[J].Journal of Yunmeng,2005,26(3):22-25.
Authors:ZHAN Xiao-yong
Abstract:The Bibliography Synopsis of Classical Chinese Novels by Ning Jia-yu Aims to surpass its preceding novel bibliographies and dictionaries, including The Bibliography Synopsis of Classical Chinese Novels, but it contains some existing and recorded novels which, however he recklessly declares were "not recorded", "lost" or "unseen". He is very casual, or even indiscreet when he deals with the classification and types of the novels. What makes us suspect his "academic" is that he doesn't point out the original of the novels as much as possible, but plagiarizes the works of others, including The History of Pre-tang Romances and The Records of Romances in Tang and Five-dynasty Period by Li Jian-guo.
Keywords:Ning Jia-yu  plagiarize  the Bibliography of Classical Chinese Novel  Li Jian-guo
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号