“抗逆力"与“公共性" :乡村振兴的双重动力与衰退地域重建

乡村空心化的报道日益增多,以乡村终结为代表的“地域衰退叙事"层出不穷。 作为回应,十九大报告提出乡村振兴战略,从经济、政治、文化、社会等方面为乡村振兴提供全方位整体规划。 更为重要的是,乡村振兴战略成为新农村建设的深化之处在于乡村动力问题的分析和指导框架的更新。 鉴于此,“抗逆力"与“公共性"两个活跃于社会科学的范式,在本体论、认识论和着力点等方面各有千秋,若将两者的“动态能动性"与“常态反思性"相结合,就能捕捉到当今乡村“风险"与“常态"同在的两大特点,继而促使我们从“风险性的主动应对"和“常态性的公共性营造"两个角度思考乡村振兴的双重动力问题,有利于在“动静结合"之中对乡村面临的自然和社会风险做到“攻守兼备",真正促进乡村振兴战略的可持续性发展。

Resilience and Publicness: Dual Dynamic of Rural Revitalization and Reconstruction of Declined Region

Recently, numbers of rural hollowing reports are rising, which especially is focused on the discourse of rural de-cline. As a response, rural revitalization strategy was proposed in the report of 19th Communist Party of China National Congress in 2017, paying attention to thriving businesses, pleasant living environment, social etiquette and civility, effect-tive governance, prosperity and out of poverty. More importantly, the main contribution of Rural Revitalization Strategy is its analysis of rural dynamics and theoretical framework. Therefore, as important paradigms of social science, resilience and publicness, with different features in aspects of ontology, epistemology and focus, can provide us two different perspectives to understand dual dynamics of rural revitalization strategy, so as to promote its sustainable development.