军人战场投降罪存废之我见

军人战场投降罪是在特殊环境下通过立法而成为罪名的，学者们一直有所争议。并且中国几千年的立法实践中，直有秦汉才有这一罪名，成熟的隋唐立法已经删去了这种过于偏激的立法；其次，军人战场投降罪与我们党和国家正在摸索和实践中的以人为本的政策也是不相融和的；同时在刑法学理论上，因为军人受到最狭义的胁迫，不应有自由意志，因而不应承担刑事责任，也不构成犯罪；这种追究军人战场投降罪使我们对待志愿军战俘上有着错误的教训，这种罪名也与世界各国的立法存在极大的反差，也使我国蒙受舆论上的损害，因此，作者提出删除或修改军人战场投降罪。

Should the Crime of Soldier＇s Capitulation in Battlefield be Deleted？

The crime of soldier＇s capitulation in battlefield was drafted as a crime in a special period of history, on which there have been arguments among scholars. First, from the legislative history of our country, only the Qin Dynasty and the Han Dynasty had this crime. The ripe legislation deleted this crime in the Sui Dynasty and the Tang Dynasty. Second,the crime legislation of soldier＇s capitulation in battlefield contradicts with the people-first policy of our party and government. Third, in the theory of criminology, the soldier is in coercion in a strict sense, and loses his free exercise of will, and should not bear the criminal responsibility. So the authors suggest that our country delete the crime of soldier＇s capitulation in battlefield.