上海多性伴性行为现状及其影响因素研究

本文利用上海市的调查数据，首先考察了上海市多性伴性行为的性别差异，接着从阶层归属、家庭亲属生活、性爱生活和性别规范四个层面对多性伴性行为的影响因素进行理论建构。研究结果表明：在多性伴性行为中，“生理需要论”并不起作用；“资本运作”和“环境影响”取代“阶层归属”发挥显性作用；“婚内感情论”具有一定合理性但也存在时效性，“头两年之痒”和“七年之痒”并存；“越轨”性行为具有连贯性；性别规范通过中间变量（两性在社会、家庭和性领域的角色扮演）间接影响两性的性活动方式。因此，我们需要以社会性别视角鉴别女性“性革命”成功与否，思考女性在性地位上是真正解放还是重新被奴役。

Theoretic Construction and Empirical Test of Multiple Sex Partners Behavior in Shanghai

From a gender perspective, using the data of sexual behavior and reproduction health in Shanghai in 2007-2008，this paper first finds out regarding multiple sex partners behavior, there are obvious differences across gender in terms of the characteristics of the sex partners, the process of finding sex partners and the situation of unprotected sex and prostitution. We then construct a theoretical model to explain the gendered differences and use the empirical data to test the model. Our Logistic regression finds out that apart from gender, four factors, including social standing (household registration status, income, education and occupation), family life (marriage, reproduction, time of living together and relative relationships), previous sex life (age of first time sexual intercourse, being engaged in pre marital cohabitation or not, conjugal trust) and perceived gender norms, mainly contribute to one’s multiple sex partner behavior. This model therefore challenges the “physical needs” theory and offers more interesting findings, for example, one’s “capital operation” and situation enacting bigger influences than one’s social standing; and marital affection encounters a low after both two year and seven year of marriage; sexual transgressions are continuous; and gender norms affect one’s multiple sex partner behavior through their shaping effects within family and the society. In the end, we suggest that more attention should be paid to three related areas: firstly, sex satisfaction of migrant workers in urban China; secondly, the construction of a new partner or family relationship; and finally, the promotion of knowledge regarding sex and sexual safety. We also call for a reflection upon whether the sex revolution for women a real revolution or a new oppression.