首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

网络侵权案件证据运用比较研究
引用本文:李雁凌.网络侵权案件证据运用比较研究[J].河南教育学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,27(4):111-113.
作者姓名:李雁凌
作者单位:西北政法大学民商法学院,西安,710063
摘    要:与传统侵权案件证据运用问题相比,网络侵权案件证据运用仍是个全新的问题。由于现行证据法律规定的限制,网络侵权证据运用面临许多实际困难,比如如何确定网络证据采纳标准和开示的范围等。在我国目前尚无统一的网络证据法规的情况下,比较、评判和吸收美国、加拿大等西方发达国家的相关立法,针对我国网络侵权案件证据运用的实际情况,运用法律和技术双重手段解决网络证据采纳、开示过程中的难题,应是理性之选。

关 键 词:网络证据  可采性  证据开示

Comparative Study on the Evidence Utilization in the Network Right Infrigement Case
LI Yanling.Comparative Study on the Evidence Utilization in the Network Right Infrigement Case[J].Journal of Henan Education Institute(Philosophy and Social Science Edition),2008,27(4):111-113.
Authors:LI Yanling
Institution:LI Yanling (Civil and Commercial Law School, Northwest University of Politics and Law, Xi' an 710063, China)
Abstract:Compared with the evidence utilization of the traditional right infringement cases, the network right infringement case is still a brand - new question. Because of the present legal evidence' s limit to evidence utilizations, the network right infringement faced with many practical difficulties, such as, how determine the acceptance standard of the network evidence and the scope of writes out, and so on. In the situation that there are no unified network evidence laws and regulations at present in our country and judges of related legislations in the western developed countries, such as US, Canada, in view of evidence utilization' s actual situation in our country network right infringement case, using legal and the technical dual method to the difficult problems in the process of the net- work acceptance and writes out, should be choice.
Keywords:network evidence  admissibility  the evidence writes out  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号