| 论取得时效制度及其立法体例 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王鹏.论取得时效制度及其立法体例[J].江苏科技大学学报(自然科学版),2004,4(3):13-15,50. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王鹏 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海交通大学,法学院,上海,200030 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 取得时效制度已经被大多数的国家所承认 ,而我国的民法通则并没有规定取得时效制度。学术界有两种观点 ,一为肯定说 ,一为否定说。笔者认为我国在制定民法典时应建立取得时效制度 ,采用法国民法典为代表的立法体例
|
| 关 键 词： | 取得时效 立法体例 肯定 否定 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-7082(2004)03-0013-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年11月17 |
Research on the Institution of Usucaption and the Legislative Style of the Institution of Usucaption |
| |
| WANG Peng.Research on the Institution of Usucaption and the Legislative Style of the Institution of Usucaption[J].Jiangsu University of Science and Technology:Social Science Edition,2004,4(3):13-15,50. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Peng |
| |
| Abstract: | The institution of usucaption has been accepted by many countries. It is not provided in civil law of China. There are two doctrines in the academic world. One is affirmative doctrine, another is negative doctrine. The author thinks that it should been established in the code of civil law. It should adopt legislative style on behalf of the code of French civil law. |
| |
| Keywords: | usucaption legislative style affimation negation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
