首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

重婚罪的界定
引用本文:徐章燕.重婚罪的界定[J].河北工程大学学报(社会科学版),2004,21(4):84-85,91.
作者姓名:徐章燕
作者单位:肇庆学院,政法系,广东,肇庆,526061
摘    要:"事实婚姻"、"事实重婚"、"非法同居"以及"事实婚"是各自有着不同内涵的概念,对其的混乱使用导致理论界的矛盾与纷争,文章理清了四个概念的不同内涵,把重婚罪的客观方面界定为前婚必须有效婚姻,后婚必须是无效婚姻,但并非所有的重婚行为都是犯罪,重婚罪的界定还要立足于法律体系这个整体,在民法、行政法规定的基础上去认定重婚罪的成立与否。

关 键 词:事实婚姻  事实重婚  非法同居
文章编号:1008-9896(2004)04-0084-03
修稿时间:2004年8月27日

The defining of bigamic marriage
Authors:XU Zhang-yan Dept of Politics and Law  Zhaoqing College  Zhaoqing China
Institution:XU Zhang-yan Dept of Politics and Law,Zhaoqing College,Zhaoqing 526061 .China
Abstract:"The marriage of fact","factual bigamic marriage" "illicit cohabitation" and "factual marriage" are different concepts with different meaning. There are lots of disputes and contradictions in the area of theory resulting from using the concepts above mentioned in a confused manner . Basing on analyzing the meaning of the four concepts, I consider that the objective aspects of bigamy should be this: the former marriage must be legal marriage and the latter illegal marriage. Moreover not all bigamy acts are crime, the civil law and administrative law should be in consideration from the angle of whole legal system.
Keywords:The marriage of fact  factual bigamic marriage  illicit cohabitation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号