首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论陪审团制度在中国的确立
引用本文:杨明,张皓.论陪审团制度在中国的确立[J].辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,33(4):152-156.
作者姓名:杨明  张皓
作者单位:辽宁大学法学院,辽宁,沈阳,110036;辽宁省教育厅政策法规处,辽宁,沈阳,110032
摘    要:体现司法民主化和审判公正的陪审制度普遍存在于当代世界各国的立法与司法中,根据其形式的不同,又可分为以英美法系国家为代表的陪审团制和以大陆法系国家为代表的参审制两种。通过对两大法系陪审制的利弊权衡,我国应废弃现有的人民陪审员制,在保留法官合议的基础上重构适合我国国情的陪审团制度。

关 键 词:陪审团制  参审制  司法民主  审判公正
文章编号:1002-3291(2005)04-0152-05
修稿时间:2004年6月15日

The Building of Jury System in China
YANG Ming,ZHANG Hao.The Building of Jury System in China[J].Jounal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2005,33(4):152-156.
Authors:YANG Ming  ZHANG Hao
Abstract:The jury system which reflects judicial democracy and judicial fair generally exists all present-day countries in the world, according to the differences of form, it can be divided into two forms: jury system that represents the jury system in the law system of Britain and America ,attend system that represents the countries of continental system. Having weighed the advantages and disadvantages of the two legal systems jury system, the system of peoples assessors should be abandoned in our country. On the basis of retaining the judge collegiate system, we should rebuild the jury system which is suitable for the condition of China.
Keywords:jury system  attend system  judicial democracy  judicial fair
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号