《老子》郭店简本与今本、帛本的关系

关于《老子》郭店简本与今本、帛书本的关系,学界观点主要有"来源说"与"摘抄说"。"摘抄说"的论据和论点都难以成立;"来源说"虽结论允当,但其立论依据有失偏颇。将《老子》郭店简本与今本、帛书本有关内容相比较,从简本之符号标示位置,以及简本、今本、帛书本中某些章句的划分等方面可以看出,简本《老子》虽然未必是今本、帛书本的祖本,但必然是今本、帛书本形成的来源。

On the Relationship between the Bamboo Edition Unearthed at Guodian, the Current Edition and the Silk Edition of Laozi

There are three recognized editions of Laozi,namely,the bamboo edition unearthed at Guodian,the current edition and the silk edition.As for their relationship,two viewpoints are prevalent: the first is the excerpt hypothesis and the second is the immediate origin hypothesis.Some scholars believe that the later two editions are just excerpts,while others uphold the viewpoint that the bamboo edition unearthed at Guodian is the immediate origin of the later two editions.The excerpt hypothesis is shaky due to the lack of evidence.The immediate origin hypothesis requires revision.By comparing the bamboo edition unearthed at Guodian with the current edition and the silk edition on the basis of the location of punctuation marks and the splitting of clauses,sentences and chapters,the bamboo edition is found to be the indirect origin of the later two editions.