| 大学英语"传统写作教学法"与"写长法"之比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 盛仁泽,冯天菊,SHENG Ren-ze,FENG Tian-ju.大学英语"传统写作教学法"与"写长法"之比较[J].西南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,4(1):123-125. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 盛仁泽 冯天菊 SHENG Ren-ze FENG Tian-ju |
| |
| 作者单位： | 重庆三峡学院,公共外语教学部,重庆,万州,404000 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 本文系重庆三峡学院教学改革资助项目(JG05019). |
| |
| 摘 要： | “传统写作教学”法对我国高校英语写作教学影响深远。“写长法”是对“传统写作教学法”的改革和一种新的写作教学尝试。本文通过调查分析和对两种写作教学法的对比研究,从如何提高学生的英语写作能力,阐述了对目前英语写作教学法进行改革的必要性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 大学英语 传统写作教学法 写长法 比较 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-5379(2006)01-0123-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年9月2日 |
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH AND THE LENGTH APPROACH FOR THE COLLEGE ENGLISH WRITING COURSE |
| |
| SHENG Ren-ze,FENG Tian-ju.COMPARISON BETWEEN THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH AND THE LENGTH APPROACH FOR THE COLLEGE ENGLISH WRITING COURSE[J].Journal of Southwest Agricultural University:Social Science Edition,2006,4(1):123-125. |
| |
| Authors: | SHENG Ren-ze FENG Tian-ju |
| |
| Abstract: | The traditional writing approach has a profound influence on College English writing teaching in China. The length writing approach represents an attempt for its improvement. This paper makes a comparative study of the two and concludes that it is necessary to reform and improve College English writing teaching through the adoption of the length writing approach. |
| |
| Keywords: | College English traditional writing approach length writing approach comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《西南农业大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《西南农业大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文 |
