20世纪学术史背景下的陈寅恪、唐长孺和胡如雷

朱雷通过回顾唐长孺领导敦煌吐鲁番文书整理出版的整个过程,介绍了古代文献资料整理的特点和规律。张国刚认为,在中国20世纪学术发展的宏观走向上,出现了一个从否定传统到呼唤回归本土化的历史演变过程,而在这一变化过程中,陈寅恪、唐长孺、胡如雷都做出了各自的探索。冻国栋从社会经济史的角度,探讨了唐长孺在中古史研究方面的取得的突出成就,对唐长孺的治学理路和特点作出了准确概括。宁志新和黄正建侧重分析了胡如雷在历史研究中所运用的阶级与阶层分析方法,并对这一治学方法做出了客观和科学的评价。孙继民在20世纪学术史的背景下,从20 世纪中国史学发展的四个阶段分析和确认了陈寅恪、唐长孺、胡如雷史学研究成就和他们在中国学术史上的地位。认为陈寅恪的特点是承旧启新,文化史观中国化;唐长孺是转旧趋新,唯物史观学术化;胡如雷是弃旧开新,古史形态理论化。

Chen Yinque, Tang Changru and Hu Rulei in the Academic Backgrounds of the 20th Century (special topic for discussion)

In the backgrounds of academic history in the 20th century, Sun Jimin, according to the four developing periods of China "s historiography, analyses Chen Yinque, Tang Changru and Hu Rulei 's a chievements in historiography and affirms their status in Chinas academic history. He thinks Mr. Chen inherits the old and starts the new with Chinese style of cultural history. And Tang Changru walks from the old to the new with academic style of materialist history. And Hu Rulei abandons the old and opens the new with theoretical style of ancient history. In addition, such scholars as Zhu Lei, Zhang Guogang, Dong Guodong, Ning Zhixin and Huang Zhengjian also give their opinions.