一般侵权行为构成的否思

对于一般侵权行为，惯常的思维是从各个要件分别下手进行分析，然后综合各个要件从而得出结论，这是一种并和相加的简单方式，并不能得出对一般侵权行为实质的判断，因为仅仅从形式上分析侵权行为的构成并不符合马克思主义要求的辩证统一。基于对传统的一般侵权行为构成的否定思考，从一个具体的案件出发，从宏观和微观对侵权行为进行考察，可以发现，侵权行为的构成要件是实质要件而非仅为形式要件；对于侵权行为构成要件的认识不能与侵权行为的可归责性相背离。

Thinking of the Constitution of General Tort Acts

When determining general tort acts，it is common practice to analyze every important component respectively，and then get the conclusion by synthesizing each component. This simple combining and adding cannot lead to a sound judgment of the nature of general tort acts，because analyzing the constitution of general tort acts from the form only doesn’t meet the requirement of dialectical unity of Marxism. Therefore，the author，starting from a specific case and investigating the tort acts from both macro and micro aspects，analyzes the constitution of general tort acts in a reversed way and finds out that the components of tort acts are not only formal factors but substantial factors. The recognition of the constitution of general tort acts cannot deviate from the accountability of tort acts.