| 权利话语在司法裁判中的局限性探析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 邱宁,陆幸福. 权利话语在司法裁判中的局限性探析[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 0(11): 91-95 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 邱宁 陆幸福 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 西南政法大学 行政法学院,重庆 401120; 重庆理工大学 知识产权学院,重庆 400054
2. 西南政法大学 行政法学院,重庆,401120 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 司法部2012年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目“权利话语在司法裁判中的局限及其补救”(12SFB3001)的研究成果之一。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 权利话语在司法裁判中具有不确定性,具体包括权利存在与否不确定以及权利与利益诉求之间的对应性不确定。为降低权利的不确定性,应在立法中尽量使用明确的词语,并通过法律解释细化权利的内容。权利冲突是权利话语在司法中局限性的第二个表现,区分权利位阶与利益衡量是解决此问题的两种主要方式。权利滥用是权利话语的又一种局限,可以通过举证责任倒置解决此问题。
|
| 关 键 词： | 权利 司法裁判 不确定性 权利冲突 权利滥用 |
On Limit of Discourse of Right in Process of Judicial Trial |
| |
| QIU Ning,LU Xing-fu. On Limit of Discourse of Right in Process of Judicial Trial[J]. Journal of Chongqing Institute of Technology, 2014, 0(11): 91-95 |
| |
| Authors: | QIU Ning LU Xing-fu |
| |
| Affiliation: | QIU Ning,LU Xing-fu( 1. School of Administrative Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China; 2. Intellectual Property Institute, Chonging University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The discourse of right is indeterminate in the process of judicial trial,which includes whether there is right and whether the right and the interest appealing correspond with each other. To lower the possibility of indeterminacy,we should use clear words in legislation as could as possible,and explain the right in detail. The conflict of rights is the second aspect of limit of discourse of right,and to distinguish the positions of rights and to balance the interest related to rights are two ways to solve this problem. Abuse of rights is the third limit of discourse of right,and we could use burden of proof by defendant to solve it. |
| |
| Keywords: | right judicial trial indeterminacy conflict of rights abuse of rights |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
