Toward increased public representation on bioethics committees: Lessons from Judging the cold war human radiation experiments? |
| |
Authors: | Carolyn Szetela |
| |
Institution: | Department of Philosophy , University of Tennessee , Knoxville, TN, 37996 |
| |
Abstract: | The process of judging the Cold War Human Radiation Experiments illuminates a need to develop a model for an appropriate public role on bioethics committees. A citizen representative was appointed to the President's Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments, and the Committee solicited broad public participation in their investigation. However, many members of the affected and interested public desired further representation on the Committee, as they tended towards stronger ethical condemnations of the experiments than the Committee expressed. I offer an account of a testimony before the Committee by a radiation experiment subject's survivor to illustrate this contrast in moral perspective. I consider some the contributions that “non‐expert”; public members can add to committee deliberations, and suggest that concerns about public representatives may be overcome with the guidance of clearer principles for selecting public members. Further efforts to increase membership by the general and affected public on bioethics committees will enhance deliberations and help realize the democratic ideals of bioethics. |
| |
Keywords: | Bioethics committees public representation human radiation experiments Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE) |
|
|