New Classification of Research Misconduct from the Viewpoint of Truth,Trust, and Risk |
| |
Authors: | Toshio Kuroki |
| |
Institution: | 1. Research Center for Science Systems, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Tokyo, Japant96tree@kfa.biglobe.ne.jp |
| |
Abstract: | ABSTRACTFabrication, Falsification and Plagiarism (FFP) and Questionable Research Practice (QRP) have been used worldwide in the classification of research misconduct. However, FFP comprises two distinct categories of misconduct: FF is extreme research misconduct that betrays truth, while P undermines trust of science community. Irreproducibility and inadequate practice of research also betray trust. Research misconduct has the potential to cause serious risk of safety in daily life. The proposed classification system is outlined as follows: Class I misconduct: Betrayal of the truth: (1) Fabrication and (2) Falsification. Class II misconduct: Betrayal of trust: (1) Plagiarism of text ; Irreproducibility; and (3) Inadequate research practice. Class III misconduct: Risk to safety of health and industrial products: (1) Risk to safety of health and (2) Risk to safety of industrial products. The proposed classification reflects deeper values of truth, trust, and risk more directly than the previous classification and elucidates issues about nature and significance of misconduct. |
| |
Keywords: | Classification of research misconduct fabricaiton and falsification inadequate research practice irreproducibility plagiarism risk to safety |
|
|