首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

网络直播平台帮助犯罪行为的处罚边界
引用本文:霍俊阁.网络直播平台帮助犯罪行为的处罚边界[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2021,27(2):144-154.
作者姓名:霍俊阁
作者单位:西南政法大学人工智能法学院,重庆 401120
基金项目:河南省高等学校人文社会科学研究项目"我国刑法立法明确性的系统检视与实现路径研究(1979—2019)"(2021-ZZJH-443);国家社会科学基金西部项目"刑罚退出机制的价值确立与实践运行研究";西南政法大学校级重点项目"司法解释中的出罪及其规范构建研究"
摘    要:划定网络直播平台帮助犯罪行为的刑事责任形态和刑事责任边界,应当转变一刀切、等同化的认知模式,采取类型化、个别化的处置模式.依据网络直播平台帮助犯罪行为的积极性、主动性程度,可以将其帮助犯罪的行为划分为对犯罪行为的单纯不作为帮助、对犯罪行为经责令改正后仍不作为帮助、对犯罪行为的作为帮助三种类型.在此基础上,才能进一步澄清网络直播平台帮助犯罪行为的刑事责任形态与具体边界.虽然,在刑事责任形态上,网络直播平台单纯不作为帮助行为应当承担所帮助犯罪的共犯责任;经责令改正后仍不作为的帮助行为,应当承担拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪的正犯责任;网络直播平台作为帮助行为,原则上应当承担帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪的正犯责任,例外的应承担所帮助犯罪的共犯责任.但是,在刑事责任追究上,如果网络直播平台的单纯不作为帮助行为成立中性业务行为的,经责令改正后仍不作为帮助行为在正常运营上缺乏义务履行可能性或者在技术上缺乏结果回避可能性的,以及作为帮助行为符合不追诉条件的,应当阻却对网络直播平台的刑法处罚.

关 键 词:网络直播平台  犯罪帮助行为  信息网络安全  中性业务行为  网络共犯  刑事追诉
修稿时间:2020/12/15 0:00:00

Punishment boundary for online live broadcast platform's aiding act
HUO Junge.Punishment boundary for online live broadcast platform's aiding act[J].Journal of Chongqing University(Social Sciences Edition),2021,27(2):144-154.
Authors:HUO Junge
Institution:School of Artificial Intelligence and Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, P. R. China
Abstract:At present, the existing one-size-fits-all, equalized cognitive models in determining criminal responsibility forms and boundaries of criminal responsibility for online live broadcast platforms in helping criminal behaviors must be changed to adopt a typed and individualized disposal model. According to the enthusiasm of online live broadcast platform in helping criminal behavior, the online live broadcast platform''s help to the crime can be divided into simple inaction help to the criminal behavior, inaction to the criminal behavior after being ordered to be corrected, and acts to help criminal behavior. On this basis, we can further clarify the criminal responsibility forms and specific boundaries of online live broadcast platforms in helping criminal behavior. In the form of criminal responsibility, online live broadcast platform shall simply bear the accomplice responsibility for the crimes it is assisting; the helping behavior that fails to act after being ordered to correct shall bear the responsibility for the offender who refuses to perform the obligation of manage the information network security; as a helping act, the online live broadcast platform should, in principle, bear the responsibility of crime of helping cybercrime, and the exception should bear the accomplice responsibility of the crime helped. However, in charging criminal liability, if the simple inaction of online live broadcast platform establish a neutral business behavior, or if when being ordered to correct, the possibility of performing obligations or avoiding the results technically is lack, or if a helping act meets the conditions of non-prosecution, criminal punishment on the online live broadcast platform should be prevented.
Keywords:online live broadcast platform  help criminal behavior  information network security  neutral business behavior  cyber accomplice  criminal prosecution
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号