首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

美德两国违宪审查制度比较研究
引用本文:张建新. 美德两国违宪审查制度比较研究[J]. 淮海工学院学报(社会科学版), 2004, 2(1): 8-11
作者姓名:张建新
作者单位:郑州大学,法学院,河南,郑州,450052
摘    要:为使宪法从名义宪法成为规范宪法 ,建立和完善宪法保障制度尤其是违宪审查制度必不可少。从这一目的出发 ,对美德两国的违宪审查制度在审查主体、审查对象、审查方式、审查时机、审查结果等方面的差异进行了系统的分析 ,并就影响两国违宪审查制度模式选择的因素进行了剖解 ,以期对建立我国的违宪审查制度有所借鉴和启迪。

关 键 词:违宪审查  政治问题  宪法法院  宪法诉愿
文章编号:1008-3499(2004)01-0008-04
修稿时间:2003-11-26

A Comparative Study on the Judicial Review Systems in the U.S.A.and Germany
ZHANG Jianxin. A Comparative Study on the Judicial Review Systems in the U.S.A.and Germany[J]. Journal of Huaihai Institute of Technology, 2004, 2(1): 8-11
Authors:ZHANG Jianxin
Abstract:The formulation and perfection of constitutional safeguard systems,especially the judicial review system,are necessary in changing constitutional norms into a normative constitution. In this respect,a systematic analysis is made in this paper on the differences between the judicial review systems in the U.S.A. and Germany, especially those in subjects, objects, methods, opportunity and effect. Furthermore, the factors which influence the choice of the judicial review systems in these two countries are examined hereafter to throw light on the formulation of a judicial review system in our country.
Keywords:judicial review  political problems  constitutional court  constitutional complaint
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号