| 道的悖论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 彭富春.道的悖论[J].武汉大学学报(人文科学版),2000(1). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 彭富春 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 武汉大学人文科学学院!湖北武汉430072 |
| |
| 摘 要： | “道”是道家思想乃至中国思想的根本问题,尽管它始终激起人们对它的沉思,但它自身却仍然保持谜一般的特性。这在于道在根本上是一个悖论。老子揭示了道的悖论的三个方面:其一,道自身是有无的生成;其二,无道是自相矛盾的,并因此是自身消解的;其三,道与无道构成了真与假的对立和斗争。但老子之道只是自然之道,而不是语言之道,因此它不能让道作为自身显现出来。现代思想的任务是将道带向语言
|
| 关 键 词： | 道 悖论 自然 边界 |
On the Paradox of Tao |
| |
| PENG Fu,chun.On the Paradox of Tao[J].Wuhan University Journal (Humanity Sciences),2000(1). |
| |
| Authors: | PENG Fu chun |
| |
| Abstract: | Tao is the essential problem of Taoism or even of Chinese thoughts. Although it has always been exciting the contemplation, it is in itself characteristic of mystery. This consists in that Tao is at the bottom a paradox. Laotzs revealed the three points of the paradox of Tao: firstly, Tao itself is the becoming of being and non being; secondly, Non Tao is self contrary, and is self deconstructed; thirdly, Tao and Non Tao form a contrariety and conflict of truth and falsehood. However, Laotzs's Tao is alone the way of nature, but not the way of Word, so it can't leave Tao appear itself as such. Bringing Tao towards the language is the task of modern thoughts. |
| |
| Keywords: | Tao paradox nature limit |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
