首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

对牟宗三诠释朱熹以《大学》为规模的方法论反省
引用本文:杜保瑞.对牟宗三诠释朱熹以《大学》为规模的方法论反省[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2011,25(1):26-33.
作者姓名:杜保瑞
作者单位:台湾大学,哲学系,台湾,台北
摘    要:针对牟先生<心体与性体>(第三册)论朱熹的<大学>诠释部份做讨论,牟先生在此章中有几个特别的意见应为提出并讨论之,包括:以"顺取"说<大学>之工夫,以"明德"为德行而非德性,以"穷理"之所穷为存有论意旨,以"格物致知"为泛认知主义,以<大学>为与<论、孟、庸、易>不同的经典,以"他律道德"说格物致知工夫,以"诚意"与"格致"不是同一种工夫等等,而牟先生讨论这几项议题的哲学立场则是与全书其他章节的立场完全一致的.这些意见都是笔者以为不恰当的朱学诠释意见,牟先生并以之而设定一"横摄静涵"的型态以说朱熹为孔孟之别子,但笔者反对朱熹有牟先生所说的这一种型态之理论.

关 键 词:牟宗三  朱熹  大学  程颐

The Methodological Reflection to the Interpretation of Zhu Xi's Study of the Great Learning by Mou Zong San
DU Bao rui.The Methodological Reflection to the Interpretation of Zhu Xi's Study of the Great Learning by Mou Zong San[J].Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences),2011,25(1):26-33.
Authors:DU Bao rui
Institution:DU Bao-rui(Department of Philosophy,Taiwan University,Taipei,China)
Abstract:Aiming to critic Zhu Xi's philosophy seems to be the main purpose why Mou Zong San conducts his great book Xin Ti and Xing Ti in order to interpret the philosophy of all the Song Ming Neo-Confucians. By doing so,he spontaneous creates his own philosophical system. Based on his own opinions,he does not only critic Cheng Yi and Zhu Xi philosophy but also including most of the other Neo-Confucians. Thus,it causes a big obstacle to all the modern studiers for their understanding of Neo-Confucianism. In order to...
Keywords:Mou Zong San  Zhu Xi  Great Learning  Cheng Yi  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号