孙中山与费尔巴哈实践观之比较

在实践的内容和形式问题上 ,孙中山已基本把实践看作是人们变革现实世界的感性物质活动 ,费尔巴哈则把实践归结为人们的感性直观、经商牟利和吃喝玩乐等活动 ;在实践的地位和作用问题上 ,孙中山认识到了实践作为认识的来源、标准和目的的能动作用 ,费尔巴哈仅仅把实践看作是人的直观、被动和消极的活动。二人实践观差异的原因 :孙中山作为注重进化和实践的唯物主义者 ,注意吸收自然科学知识 ,能够关注社会现实 ,积极投身革命 ,从而使其实践观达到了时代应有的高度 ;费尔巴哈作为人本主义和直观的唯物主义者 ,离开社会性来谈论人 ,从而使其实践观带有严重的缺陷。哲学工作者只有关注现代科学技术发展的新成就 ,积极投身社会改革洪流 ,才能不断推动哲学的进步与发展。

A Comparison between SUN Zhong-shan and Feurerbach in Views of Practice

Sun Zhongshan thinks that practice is the perceptual material activity which people are enganed in to transform the objective world. On the contrary, Ferurerbach thinks that practice is the activity of perceptual contemplation, doing business, eating, drinking and amusement. SUN understands the dynamic action of practice as the sources, test and ends of knewledye. Feurerbach considers practiceas man's perception and passive activity. The reason for the difference between SUN and Fenrerbach in the view of practice is that as a revolutionary and practical materialist, SUN lays stress on studying the knowledge of natural science,pays close attention to the social reality and, plunges into the revolutionary struggle, all of which make SUN's view of practice reach a higher level at that time. However, as an anthroplogist and contemplative materialist, Feurerbach ignores people's social characters. These let his view of practice have some serious shortcomings. In order to propel philosophy forward, we must lay stress on the new achievement of modern science and technology and plunge into the current social reform.