首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

改革我国民事审级制度的理论与实践
引用本文:俞亮,张驰.改革我国民事审级制度的理论与实践[J].电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2004,6(2):74-78,91.
作者姓名:俞亮  张驰
作者单位:中国政法大学,北京,100088;北京市第一中级人民法院,北京,100040
摘    要:长期以来,我国的民事审级制度一直坚持的是单一的两审终审制,但随着我国社会生活的飞速发展,两审终审制在实践中已经暴露出了越来越多的缺陷.因此,对我国的民事审级制度有必要从理论上进行重新的反思,进而用公认的价值标准和技术措施来对我国的民事审级制度进行改造,并最终确立有限的三审终审和有条件的一审终审相结合的民事审级制度.

关 键 词:民事审级制度  上诉  一审终审  两审终审  三审终审
文章编号:1008-8105(2004)02-0074-05
修稿时间:2003年12月16

The Theory and Practice of the Reform to the Trial-tier of Civil Procedure
YU Liang.The Theory and Practice of the Reform to the Trial-tier of Civil Procedure[J].Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(Social Sciences Edition),2004,6(2):74-78,91.
Authors:YU Liang
Institution:YU Liang (University of Political Science and Law Beijing 100088 China) ZHANG Chi (The First Intermediate People's Court of Beijing Beijing 100040 China)
Abstract:The system of second instance as the finality has been the single trial-tier of civil procedure for a long time. With the fast development of the society in our country, the system of second instance as the finality has brought more and more problems in the judicial practice. Therefore, it is necessary to review the trial-tier of civil procedure from the prospect of theory and reform it in accordance with the recognized principles of value and technical means. Finally, a trial-tier of civil procedure which is combined by the limited third instance as the finality and the conditional first instance as the finality should be established.
Keywords:the trial-tier of civil procedure  appeal  first instance as the finality  second instance as the finality  third instance as the finality
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号