| 担保法司法解释第四条争议之我见 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孙淑云.担保法司法解释第四条争议之我见[J].山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002,25(3):57-60. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孙淑云 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山西大学法学院，山西 太原 030006 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 担保法司法解释第 4条规定的公司担保合同效力问题 ,目前在司法实践中争议较大。该文通过比较不同观点 ,提出两大疑点 ,进而对该两大疑点进行了具体解析 ,澄清了董事、经理越权以公司资产为本公司股东或者其他个人债务提供担保的效力 ,并对担保法司法解释第 4条提出了具体修改建议。
|
| 关 键 词： | 担保合同效力 公司 董事 经理 越权行为 表见代表 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-5935(2002)03-0057-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002年1月17日 |
My Ideas for Item 4 of the Legal Interpretation in Law of Warranty |
| |
| SUN Su-yun.My Ideas for Item 4 of the Legal Interpretation in Law of Warranty[J].Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2002,25(3):57-60. |
| |
| Authors: | SUN Su-yun |
| |
| Abstract: | There is a sharp difference of oppinion to the force of warranted contract in Item 4 of the Legal Interpretation in Law of Warranty in legal practices. The essay, puting forward two doubtful points, gives a specific analysis and explanation to them, before defecating the force of warranty to his/her company stockholders or other individual debt by company directors and chief manager transgressing his/her authority. In the end the author successfully provides the improved suggestions in details for the force of warranted contract in Item 4 of the Legal Interpretation in Law of Warranty. |
| |
| Keywords: | force of warranted contract company director chief manager transgression agency by esttople |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
