| 国家赔偿责任归责原则之回归 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘臻荣,何亚宏. 国家赔偿责任归责原则之回归[J]. 山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2005, 28(3): 78-81 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘臻荣 何亚宏 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 山西大学,法学院,山西,太原,030006
2. 中国人民大学,法学院,北京,100872 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 归责原则作为侵权行为类型化的根据,具有统领侵权行为法其他规范的作用。国家公权力侵权行为,虽为一种特殊的侵权行为,但仍属侵权行为法总的归责原则之统辖范围。因此,“违法责任归责原则”的提法在理论上是不成立的,有必要回归到“无过错责任原则”的正确表述上来。这种回归不仅仅是法律术语规范的需要,更为重要的是,它可以引导我们把国家赔偿法的研究重心放在公权行为的违法特性方面。
|
| 关 键 词： | 违法责任原则 无过错责任原则 回归 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-5935(2005)03-0078-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-03-08 |
Replacement of Imputation of State Indemnity Law |
| |
| LIU Zhen- rong,HE Ya -hong. Replacement of Imputation of State Indemnity Law[J]. Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 28(3): 78-81 |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Zhen- rong HE Ya -hong |
| |
| Affiliation: | LIU Zhen-rong 1,HE Ya-hong 2 |
| |
| Abstract: | As the criterion for differentiating the categories of torts, imputation principles dominate other legal norms. Though the tort act of state power is the tort of obvious characteristics, general imputation principles of the tort law can still be applied to. Therefore, the expression of illegal liability is not accurate and must be replaced by principle of no-fault liability. Not only is it the normal usage of legal terms, but also the replacement can make us focus on the research of the illegality of power. |
| |
| Keywords: | principle of illegal liability principle of no-fault liability replacement |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
