| 增设肇事后逃逸罪之立法思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄丽勤.增设肇事后逃逸罪之立法思考[J].北方交通大学学报(社会科学版),2007,6(3):98-102. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄丽勤 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 同济大学法律系,上海200092 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 刑法第133条实际上规定了交通肇事和逃逸两种性质的行为,两者在主观罪过、客观行为、法定刑配置及侵犯客体方面均有很大差异。尽管逃逸以交通肇事为事实前提,但把逃逸当作交通肇事罪的加重情节是不适当的。故不宜统一定交通肇事罪,而应另定“肇事后逃逸罪”,构成该罪不以行为人已经构成交通肇事罪为前提,该罪的实质在于不履行救助义务。
|
| 关 键 词： | 交通肇事 逃逸 救助 肇事后逃逸罪 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-8106（2007）03-0098-05 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-03-09 |
A Probe into the Legislation Against the Crime of Abscondence After Traffic Accident |
| |
| Authors: | HANG Li-qin |
| |
| Abstract: | Article 133 of Criminal Law practically stipulates two different behaviors,namely,traffic accident and abscondence after traffic accident,which differ from each other considerably in subjective culpability,objective behavior,legal sentence,and infringed object.Although the escape is based on the premise of the occurrence of traffic accident,it should not be considered as the aggravating plot of the latter.Accordingly it is more appropriate to be convicted as the crime of abscondence after traffic accident,rather than the traffic accident crime. Besides,the latter should not be regarded as the premise of the former,the essence of which is the nonperformance of the rescue responsibility. |
| |
| Keywords: | traffic accident escape rescue the crime of abscondence after traffic accident |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
