首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


The context of correctness: A comment on rushton
Authors:Andrew S Winston
Institution:(1) Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, N1G 2W1 Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Abstract:According to Philippe Rushton, the ldquoequalitarian fiction,rdquo a ldquoscientific hoaxrdquo that races are genetically equal in cognitive ability, underlies the ldquopolitically correctrdquo objections to his research on racial differences. He maintains that there is a taboo against race unequaled by the Inquisition. I show that while Rushton has been publicly harassed, he has had continuous opportunities to present his findings in diverse, widely available, respectable journals, and no general suppression within academic psychology is evident. Similarly, Henry Garrett and his associates in the LAAEE, dedicated to preserving segregation and preventing ldquorace suicide,rdquo disseminated their ideas widely, although Garrett complained of the ldquoequalitarian fictionrdquo in 1961. Examination of the intertwined history ofMankind Quarterly, German Rassenhygiene, far right politics, and the work of Roger Pearson suggests that some cries of ldquopolitical correctnessrdquo must be viewed with great caution.Preparation of this paper was not supported by any grant, foundation, political, or religious organization.specializing in the history of psychology and psychological aesthetics.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号