首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

比较视野下的受教育权法律救济制度 优化路径
引用本文:阮李全陈久奎.比较视野下的受教育权法律救济制度 优化路径[J].重庆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(1):75-80.
作者姓名:阮李全陈久奎
作者单位:重庆师范大学,重庆,400047
基金项目:重庆市教委人文社科项目"教育纠纷与学生权利救济研究"
摘    要:受教育权是现代宪法所确认的一项最重要的公民基本权利之一,有关受教育权的保障和救济成为当前的热点问题,一系列教育诉讼案引起了社会广泛的关注和热烈的讨论.受教育权的法律救济制度是教育法律纠纷解决机制中的重要组成部分,世界各国因文化传统、法律制度与技术以及教育体制的差异,其受教育权的法律救济制度也不尽相同.通过比较分析两大法系受教育权法律救济相关制度的设计、实践差异,借鉴域外先进的法律技术经验,可以对我国的制度优化有所裨益.

关 键 词:受教育权  英美法系  大陆法系  非诉方式

Optimization of the Right to Education under the System of Legal Remedies in Comparative Perspective
Ruan LiquanChen Jiukui.Optimization of the Right to Education under the System of Legal Remedies in Comparative Perspective[J].Journal of Chongqing Normal University Edition of Social Siences,2013(1):75-80.
Authors:Ruan LiquanChen Jiukui
Institution:Ruan Liquan Chen Jiukui
Abstract:Right to education is considered to be one of the most important modern constitutions recognized the fundamental rights of citizens, the protection of the right to education and relief, and it become the current hot issue. A series of education litigation has caused widespread concern and heated discussion. The right to education, legal relief system is an important part in the education legal dispute settlement mechanism, the world due to the differences in cultural traditions and legal systems and technology, and education system; their right to education is not the same legal remedy system. Comparative analysis of two legal rights to education law relief system design, practice differences, learning from foreign advanced legal technology experience can be beneficial to our system optimization.
Keywords:right to education  system of Anglo-American law  civil law  Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《重庆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《重庆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号