基于情感体验和人格特质的风险决策对比研究

首次研究了轮流决策模式,并将其与个人决策进行了对比,目的是研究风险情况对于个人风险决策和两人风险决策的差异性及影响因素.通过仿真气球实验(BART)将感觉寻求与情感体验相结合,对个人决策与轮流决策风险偏好、情感体验差异以及不同人格特质对风险偏好的影响分别进行研究.结果表明:轮流决策相对于个人决策可以明显降低风险.同时,轮流决策会给被试带来更强的控制感、成就感和喜悦感,较低的后悔程度.两个高感觉寻求被试组合和两个低感觉寻求被试的组合风险状况无显著差异,一个高感觉寻求和一个低感觉寻求被试的组合的风险状况显著低于两个低感觉寻求被试组合和两个高感觉寻求被试组合.研究结论对两人决策现有研究进行了有力补充.为企业进行组织架构设计、管理人员选择与搭配提供了可借鉴的理论基础.

Comparative Study on Risk Decision Making Based on Emotional Experience and Personality Traits

Alternative decision making is first studied, and it is compared with individual decision making. The purpose is to research the differences between individual and alternative decision making and the reasons. By combining the sensation seeking and the emotional experience scales through the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), individual and alternative decision making are studied. The results show that person′s risk preference is lower in alternative decision making than that in individual decision making. Alternative decision making could bring more sense of control, achievement, happiness and less sense of regret. In two person′s combination, two high-risk-seeking individuals′ risk preference has no significant difference from that of two low-risk-seeking individuals. The risk preference of low-high individuals′ combination is the lowest among these three combinations. The research could provide more decision models when enterprise facing risk decision making. It has theoretical and practical contributions to the enterprise organization structure design and management.