首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论诉讼时效制度对返还财产请求权的适用——兼论对物上请求权是否应当适用诉讼时效制度的研讨应当仅针对返还财产请求权来进行
引用本文:张淳. 论诉讼时效制度对返还财产请求权的适用——兼论对物上请求权是否应当适用诉讼时效制度的研讨应当仅针对返还财产请求权来进行[J]. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2004, 3(1): 32-36
作者姓名:张淳
作者单位:南京大学,法学院,江苏,南京,210093
摘    要:本文认为,对物上请求权是否应当适用诉讼时效制度的研讨应当仅针对返还财产请求权来进行,存在于不同国家与地区的法律中的关于对返还财产请求权是否应当适用诉讼时效制度的不同规定各有其合理性,在我国对由未经登记的物权所派生的返还财产请求权应当适用诉讼时效制度,对由已经登记的物权所派生的这种请求权则不应当适用这一制度.

关 键 词:物权  物上请求权  返还财产请求权  诉讼时效制度
文章编号:1671-7287(2004)01-0032-05
修稿时间:2003-11-13

On Application of the Rule of Limitation to the Right of Claim for Return of Property
Zhang Chun. On Application of the Rule of Limitation to the Right of Claim for Return of Property[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Technology(Social Science Edition), 2004, 3(1): 32-36
Authors:Zhang Chun
Abstract:The author thinks that the discussion of whether the rule of limitation of action should apply to the right of claim for real thing should depend on the right of claim for return of property. The laws of different countries and districts respectively have their reasonableness on whether the rule of limitation should apply to the right of claim for return of property. In China, the rule of limitation of action should apply to the right of claim for return of property coming from the unregistered right in real thing, while such rule should not apply to the right from registered right in real thing.
Keywords:right in real thing  right of claim for real thing  right of claim for return of property  rule of limitation of action
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号