侵占罪中"拒不退还"的法律分析

侵占罪中拒不退还与拒不交出在本质上并没有什么不同,不过是表述上的不同而已.拒不退还并不是侵占行为的要素,而是限制侵占罪成立的情节.拒不退还意思表示的对象是代为保管的财物的所有人、占有权人及其代理人,拒不退还可以明示或默示的方式做出,不退还原物而支付对价的不是拒不退还,拒不退还认定的时间标准应是二审终审前.

Legal Analysis of "Refusing to Return" in Crime of Encroachment

The terms "refusing to return" and "refusing to hand over" in crime of encroachment are basic the same in essence excepting the expressive ways. Refusing to return is not the essential factor for seizure action, but one of the legal cases to restrict the founding of crime of encroachment. It is considered that the object of refusing to return is the man who acts on behalf the owner or possessor of the property. The conduction of refusing to return can be done by clear or implied showing ways. Not returning the original thing or giving some price is not refusing to return, whose time standard of determination should be fixed before the final judgment of the second judgment.