| 律师伪证罪的困境与出路 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈金林. 律师伪证罪的困境与出路[J]. 昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2009, 9(5): 57-62 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈金林 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉,430072 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《刑法》第306条有关律师伪证罪的规定一直面临着悖逆民心的困境，但其原因并非实体内容不公正，而是欠缺程序上的合理限制，由此导致它沦为检察机关实施职业报复的工具。将律师纪律处分或行政处罚程序作为刑事诉讼程序的程序性前提，把取消会员资格的行业处分或吊销律师职业证书的行政处罚作为刑事诉讼的实体性前提，并限制刑事侦查的调查范围，可以合理地限制检察机关的偏见和恣意，带领该规定走出当前的困境。
|
| 关 键 词： | 律师伪证罪 困境 程序 |
Embarrassment of Lawyer''s Falsifying Evidence Crime and the Way Out |
| |
| CHEN Jin-lin. Embarrassment of Lawyer''s Falsifying Evidence Crime and the Way Out[J]. Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences), 2009, 9(5): 57-62 |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Jin-lin |
| |
| Affiliation: | Law School of Wuhan University;Hubei Wuhan 430072;China |
| |
| Abstract: | The regulation on lawyer's crime of falsifying evidence in Article 306 of the Criminal Law of China is confronted with the resistance of the public.The reason for this,however,is not its substantial injustice,but its being out of the control of procedure,and this makes the regulation tool of the procurators' revenge against the lawyers.The way out is to make the punishment by lawyer industry or administrative punishment by the department of justice governing the necessary pre-procedure for criminal procedur... |
| |
| Keywords: | lawyer's crime of falsifying evidence embarrassment procedural |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
