首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

协商民主视角下的民主恳谈:以温岭实践为例
引用本文:薛美琴,;马超峰.协商民主视角下的民主恳谈:以温岭实践为例[J].电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2014(4):11-15.
作者姓名:薛美琴  ;马超峰
作者单位:[1]上海交通大学,上海200030; [2]温岭市委党校,温岭317500
基金项目:中共浙江省委统战部、浙江省社会科学界联合会、浙江省统一战线理论研究会2013年度联合招标课题:统一战线如何为促进协商民主发展服务(2013TZ04):四川省社会主义学院2014年度“协商民主与国家治理”课题招标:协商民主与民主恳谈(2014SCSYKT23).
摘    要:民主恳谈作为基层民主的一种重要实践形式,在10多年的发展中发挥了重要作用,得到了社会各界的认同。但是,恳谈中存在的不平等因素日益影响恳谈持续性发展。通过三种不同的民主恳谈矫正模式,通过项目支撑实现议题聚焦,专家参与协调程序公正,监督评估实现动态化恳谈。从民主恳谈的程序入手,以起点、程序、结果公正为矫正思路,借鉴协商民主的理念进一步推进民主恳谈制度的完善。在扩大参与与代议之间形成以协商民主为纽带的协调模式,是未来基层民主走出困境的有效途径。

关 键 词:民主恳谈  协商民主  项目支撑  专家参与  监督评估

Deliberative Democracy and Democratic Forum
Institution:UE Mei-qin MA Chao-feng (1.Shanghai Jiaotong University Shanghai 200030 China: 2.The Party School ofWenling Zhejiang Wenling 317500 Chian)
Abstract:As an important practice in the form of grassroots democracy, democratic forum has played an important role in more than ten-year development and it is approved by the society. However, inequality factors existing in the communion affect the sustainable development. Three different correcting modes of democratic forums are presented, that is the issues focusing by the support of projects, experts participating in the regulation of the procedure fairness, and achieving the dynamic forum under monitoring and evaluation. From the procedures of democratic forum, based on the correcting thinking of starting, processes and results, and learning the concepts of deliberative democracy, the democratic forum system can be perfected. Forming a consultative coordination model between in widening participation and representative democracy is an effective way of grassroots democracy to get out of the dilemma.
Keywords:democratic forum  deliberative democracy  project support  the participation of experts  monitoring and evaluation
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号