Advances in monitoring and evaluation in low- and middle-income countries |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. MEASURE Evaluation, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States;2. Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States;3. Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States;4. Public Health Leadership Program, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States;5. Carolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States;1. Research Group on Health Inequalities, Environment, Employment Conditions Knowledge Network, Department of Political and Social Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain;2. Johns Hopkins University - Pompeu Fabra University Public Policy Center, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain;3. Research Group of Epidemiology, National School of Public Health ‘Héctor Abad Gómez’, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia;4. Transdisciplinary Research Group on Socioecological Transitions (GinTRANS2), Universidad Autónoma, Madrid, Spain;1. University of Idaho Moscow Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive MS 2401, Moscow, ID 83843, United States;2. Southern Connecticut State University, 501 Crescent Street, New Haven, CT 06515, United States;1. Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada;2. Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta; Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Ireland;3. Faculty of Nursing, University of Navarra and IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Spain |
| |
Abstract: | Data to inform and improve health care systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been facilitated by the development of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems. The drivers of change in M&E systems over the last 50 years have included a series of health concerns that have animated global donors (e.g., family planning, vaccination campaigns, and HIV/AIDS); the data requirements of donors; improved national economies enabling LMICs to invest more in M&E systems; and rapid advances in digital technologies. Progress has included the training and expansion of an M&E workforce, the creation of systems for data collection and use, and processes for assessing and ensuring data quality. Controversies have included the development of disease-specific systems that do not coordinate with each other, and a growing burden on health care deliverers to collect data for a proliferating number of health and process indicators. Digital technologies offer the promise of real time data and quick adaptation but also raise ethical and privacy concerns. The desire for speed can cast large-scale evaluations, considered by some to be the gold standard, in an unfavorable light as slow and expensive. Accordingly, there is a growing demand for speedy evaluations that rely on routine health information systems and privately collected “big data” from electronic health records and social media. |
| |
Keywords: | Monitoring and evaluation Health information systems Developing countries |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|