| 行政诉讼第三人制度反思 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 杨桦,王成明. 行政诉讼第三人制度反思[J]. 湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2010, 28(1): 119-124 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 杨桦 王成明 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广东外语外贸大学,法学院,广东,广州,510420;广东外语外贸大学,法学院,广东,广州,510420 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 行政诉讼在审查对象、举证责任主体及举证时间限制等方面的特殊性决定了第三人制度在理论上面临无法自圆其说的障碍。在实践中,行政诉讼第三人制度也存在诸多问题,给法院及案件当事人带来了许多负面的影响。我国应取消行政诉讼第三人制度,在现有立法框架下,利害关系人仍然有多种救济渠道来保护自己的合法权益。
|
| 关 键 词： | 行政诉讼第三人 理论障碍 实践困境 反思 |
Reflections on the System of Third Party in the Administrative Litigation |
| |
| YANG Hua,WANG Cheng-ming. Reflections on the System of Third Party in the Administrative Litigation[J]. Journal of Hubei Institute for Nationalities(Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2010, 28(1): 119-124 |
| |
| Authors: | YANG Hua WANG Cheng-ming |
| |
| Affiliation: | The School of Law;Guang Dong University of Foreign Studies;Guangzhou 510420;China |
| |
| Abstract: | The speciality of the administrative litigation in the aspect of the examined object, the subjects putting to the proof and undertaking the liabilities and the time putting to the proof determines system of Third Party to encounter the theoretical self-convincing obstacle. In pracitce there are so many problems in the system of Third Party in the administrative litigation that it may exert many negative influences on the court and the litigants. It is therefore highly recommended that the system of Third Pa... |
| |
| Keywords: | the Third Party in the administrative litigation theoretical obstacle plight in reality reflections |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
