首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

黑格尔法哲学与德里达《法规的力量》比较
引用本文:威廉&#;迈兹.黑格尔法哲学与德里达《法规的力量》比较[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,44(3):76-85.
作者姓名:威廉&#;迈兹
作者单位:德国弗莱堡大学,南京大学哲学与宗教学系 教授
摘    要:把黑格尔与德里达进行对照,我们会发现:黑格尔思考的是法的自由原则,在这个原则上能够有法的建筑。而德里达在公正和暴力之间的张力区域中理解法,那里不可能有建构,而只有解构。面对西方传统和当代思想我们自身如何能够占据一个区别于后现代的立场?当代思想的整体性区分已经为我们打开对人性的居住的记忆。

关 键 词:具体的自由  婚姻  国家  公正  暴力  当下  居住  所思
文章编号:1000-5919(2007)03-0076-10
修稿时间:2007-01-20

A Comparison of Hegels' Jurisprudence and Derridas' The Strength of Rules
Wilhelm Metz.A Comparison of Hegels'''' Jurisprudence and Derridas'''' The Strength of Rules[J].Journal of Peking University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2007,44(3):76-85.
Authors:Wilhelm Metz
Institution:University of Freiburg, Germany
Abstract:This paper aims to compare Hegel's thought with Derrida's. Hegel meditated on the freedom principle of law, without which the construction of law is impossible. However, Derrida attempted to understand law from the perspective of the tensional area between justice and violence, where there is no construction but deconstruction. Facing western tradition and contemporary thinking, how can we maintain a stance differ from postmodernism? The integrated distinction of contemporary thinking has already presented us with the memory of living of humanity.
Keywords:concrete freedom  marriage  state  justice  violence
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号