试论福柯和德里达的思想差异--从《我思和疯癫的历史》谈起

福柯和德里达是20世纪后期以来西方哲学思想和文学批评领域里的两位举足轻重的人物.关于两者的思想差异理论界有多种看法,如有人认为主要表现在思想领域的不同上,有人认为主要表现在思想性质的不同上,有人认为主要表现在文本阅读方式的不同上.本文在解读那篇曾引发福柯和德里达激烈论争的论作<我思和疯癫的历史>的基础上提出福柯和德里达的思想差异主要表现在他们清理和改造传统的思想文化的思想策略的不同上.

On the Theoretical Differences between Foucault and Derrida

Foucault and Derrida are the most important figures in the philosophical and critical field of the late 20th century. There are many perspectives on their theoretical differences. Someone thinks their theoretical differences manifest themselves in the different subjects, someone thinks in the different thoughts, someone thinks in the different reading strategies. Based on the close reading of the Derrida's famous paper Cogito and the History of Madness, the author of this paper argues that the theoretical differences between Foucault and Derrida mainly manifest themselves in the different thinking strategies which are the fundamental tools to criticize and rewrite the traditional thought system.