| 论“文史两分”认识的三阶段——兼论《史通》在此过程中的理论意义 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吕海龙.论“文史两分”认识的三阶段——兼论《史通》在此过程中的理论意义[J].齐鲁学刊,2011(2). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吕海龙 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海大学,文学院,上海,200444 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社科基金项目"中国文学叙事传统研究" |
| |
| 摘 要： | 汉之前,文史一体。《史记》以后,至魏晋迄唐,文史两分。与之相对应,人们对文史异辙过程的认识,可分为三个阶段。第一阶段,文论家将重藻饰、押韵、抒情的诗赋类为主的文学作品和其他文史作品区分开来。第二阶段,史学家将史著为主的叙事性作品和文学作品分离。第三阶段,人们对以史著为主的叙事性作品自身即史著和小说的分离,有了较为准确的认识并起到了一定推动作用。在对文史两分认识逐步深入、细化的过程中,刘知几的《史通》具有重要的理论意义。
|
| 关 键 词： | 文史两分 三阶段 《史通》 理论意义 |
Three Stages of Cognition between Literature and History |
| |
| Lv Hai-long.Three Stages of Cognition between Literature and History[J].Qilu Journal,2011(2). |
| |
| Authors: | Lv Hai-long |
| |
| Abstract: | Before the Han dynasty,literature and history is almost same.From Han to Tang dynasty,literature and history started to set apart.This process was divided into three periods.The first period,Lyricism literary works differed from the others.The second period,the history works consciously keep a certain distance always from literature.The third period,the historical and biographical literature were different from novel.Liu Zhi-ji's Shitong had a special significance in this process |
| |
| Keywords: | Cognition Between literature and history three stages Shitong significance |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
