首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

对中国哲学合法性问题的新解读
引用本文:王向清,黄玉兰.对中国哲学合法性问题的新解读[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2013,16(4):29-32.
作者姓名:王向清  黄玉兰
作者单位:湘潭大学哲学与历史文化学院,湖南湘潭,411105
基金项目:湖南省研究生科研创新项目
摘    要:中国哲学合法性问题是十分复杂的,中国哲学合法性问题的讨论应基于学说与学科的角度,来对这一问题进行解构和分析.从学说的角度看,哲学学说由于受地域和文化的影响,具有独特性和个体性,所以,不同文化,不同地域都有自己的哲学学说.从学科的角度看,哲学学科具有动态性和发展性,只有挖掘中国哲学学科的研究对象、研究方法等方面的独特性,并进行系统的整理和建构,中国哲学学科的独立性才能建立.

关 键 词:中国哲学学科  哲学学说  合法性  西方哲学

A New Analysis of the Issue of Chinese Philosophy Legitimacy
WANG Xiang qing & HUANG Yu lan.A New Analysis of the Issue of Chinese Philosophy Legitimacy[J].journal of hunan university of science&technology,2013,16(4):29-32.
Authors:WANG Xiang qing & HUANG Yu lan
Institution:School of Philosophy and History Culture, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China
Abstract:The issue of Chinese philosophy legitimacy is very complicated. The issue of Chinese philosophy legitimacy should be deconstructed and analyzed through the discussions from the perspectives of doctrine and discipline. From the perspective of doctrine, philosophy doctrine is unique and individual because of the influence of regions and culture. Therefore, different cultures and regions have their own philosophy doctrine. From the perspective of discipline, philosophy discipline is dynamic and developmental. The independence of Chinese philosophy discipline depends on not only exploring the uniqueness of study object and method of Chinese philosophy discipline, but organizing and constructing them systematically.
Keywords:discipline of Chinese philosophy  philosophical doctrine  legitimacy  Western philosophy
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号